<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you generating eWaste?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/</link>
	<description>Insight from your team at ForeSite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Kerwin</title>
		<link>http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Kerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/?p=773#comment-546</guid>
		<description>In reality we should be thinking further than just recycling. I recommend everyone, literally everyone, read the book &quot;Cradle To Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things&quot; by William McDonough. His approach to manufacturing, designing, building, and improving all things is the approach that should be taken. Instead of just recycling, or as I think of it &quot;hand me downs&quot;, we design things in a way that when it comes to the end of its useful life we can put it back in the supply chain and be able to reuse almost all if not all materials used in the creation of the item to than be used in the &quot;new&quot; item. Recycling, unfortunately, takes a high quality item, i.e. high grade plastic or metal in a car, and makes it reusable, BUT not reusable as another water bottle nor another car, but something that is of less quality and will not be able to be recycled again. 

In the end recycling is delaying the item either being incinerated or put in a landfill, but doesn&#039;t eliminate it. We should be focusing on how to eliminate these precious materials being put under ground and forgotten about until a later date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reality we should be thinking further than just recycling. I recommend everyone, literally everyone, read the book &#8220;Cradle To Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things&#8221; by William McDonough. His approach to manufacturing, designing, building, and improving all things is the approach that should be taken. Instead of just recycling, or as I think of it &#8220;hand me downs&#8221;, we design things in a way that when it comes to the end of its useful life we can put it back in the supply chain and be able to reuse almost all if not all materials used in the creation of the item to than be used in the &#8220;new&#8221; item. Recycling, unfortunately, takes a high quality item, i.e. high grade plastic or metal in a car, and makes it reusable, BUT not reusable as another water bottle nor another car, but something that is of less quality and will not be able to be recycled again. </p>
<p>In the end recycling is delaying the item either being incinerated or put in a landfill, but doesn&#8217;t eliminate it. We should be focusing on how to eliminate these precious materials being put under ground and forgotten about until a later date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/?p=773#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Mike - great post and good thoughts.   E-waste is obviously a huge problem; you have to wonder where the 4 billion cell phones in use globally today (and the Lithium batteries within) are going to end up.  Reuse/Refurbish is a good start, as you point out.  There is an e-waste disposal center in West Hartford that people might not know about called Green Monster (http://greenmonsterecycling.com/) which I just used this past weekend.  Free drop off of most items, TV&#039;s cost $10.  They certify no exports offshore.

Karrie - in addition to the material possibly ending up in Chinese landfill, which is bad enough, tons of it are actually sent to Chinese villages for &quot;recycling&quot;, which unfortunately involves desperatley poor workers picking the items apart by hand, and exposing themselves, their children, and the environment (soil, streams, rivers) to the lead, cadmium and mercury that make up most of the chip components.  The workers do this because they might get to keep the tiny amounts of gold and copper they can extract, which can be traded for small amounts of cash.  Here&#039;s a news article with more detail: http://bit.ly/dfCbjN.   It&#039;s a horrendous situation that no American business owner would want to be associated with.  Hence the importance of responsible e-cycling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; great post and good thoughts.   E-waste is obviously a huge problem; you have to wonder where the 4 billion cell phones in use globally today (and the Lithium batteries within) are going to end up.  Reuse/Refurbish is a good start, as you point out.  There is an e-waste disposal center in West Hartford that people might not know about called Green Monster (<a href="http://greenmonsterecycling.com/" rel="nofollow">http://greenmonsterecycling.com/</a>) which I just used this past weekend.  Free drop off of most items, TV&#8217;s cost $10.  They certify no exports offshore.</p>
<p>Karrie &#8211; in addition to the material possibly ending up in Chinese landfill, which is bad enough, tons of it are actually sent to Chinese villages for &#8220;recycling&#8221;, which unfortunately involves desperatley poor workers picking the items apart by hand, and exposing themselves, their children, and the environment (soil, streams, rivers) to the lead, cadmium and mercury that make up most of the chip components.  The workers do this because they might get to keep the tiny amounts of gold and copper they can extract, which can be traded for small amounts of cash.  Here&#8217;s a news article with more detail: <a href="http://bit.ly/dfCbjN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dfCbjN</a>.   It&#8217;s a horrendous situation that no American business owner would want to be associated with.  Hence the importance of responsible e-cycling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/?p=773#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Karrie, the concern from a waste perspective is that the items may end up in a Chinese landfill.  An additional concern from the IT security side is that sensitive data might be left on hard drives which are then sent overseas.

We recommend first having your technology resource confirm that the hard drive is erased using a utility that writes over the old files (simply deleting files is not secure) and to donate or recycle through reputable organizations to keep usable items out of landfills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karrie, the concern from a waste perspective is that the items may end up in a Chinese landfill.  An additional concern from the IT security side is that sensitive data might be left on hard drives which are then sent overseas.</p>
<p>We recommend first having your technology resource confirm that the hard drive is erased using a utility that writes over the old files (simply deleting files is not secure) and to donate or recycle through reputable organizations to keep usable items out of landfills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karrie</title>
		<link>http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Karrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/?p=773#comment-535</guid>
		<description>What is wrong with sending to China?  Don&#039;t they need things? I don&#039;t understand what is bad about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is wrong with sending to China?  Don&#8217;t they need things? I don&#8217;t understand what is bad about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Puckett</title>
		<link>http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/2010/07/20/are-you-generating-ewaste/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Puckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresitetech.com/blog/?p=773#comment-533</guid>
		<description>E_WASTE WARNING:  Oh my.  Yes you want to recycle or reuse your equipment BUT NO you do not want to just take it to any recycler as 80% of these simply export the device offshore to be dumped in Africa or China.   Please go to our website e-Stewards.org to learn more and find recyclers that have committed to NOT do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E_WASTE WARNING:  Oh my.  Yes you want to recycle or reuse your equipment BUT NO you do not want to just take it to any recycler as 80% of these simply export the device offshore to be dumped in Africa or China.   Please go to our website e-Stewards.org to learn more and find recyclers that have committed to NOT do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

